Skip to content

SignIQ vs Dropbox Sign

HelloSign was great. Dropbox Sign is the same product with a new logo.

Dropbox acquired HelloSign in 2019. The branding got worse and the development pace stalled. If you’re evaluating Dropbox Sign in 2026, here’s the honest comparison.

What Dropbox Sign actually is.

Branding confusion

HelloSign rebranded to Dropbox Sign in 2022. Three years later, users still search for “HelloSign” and tutorials still reference the old name. The brand equity is split.

Stalled development

Post-acquisition feature velocity has slowed considerably. Developer reviews cite degraded API reliability. The roadmap reads like maintenance, not investment.

Pricing

Standard plan starts around $25/user/month, the same as DocuSign Standard, without DocuSign’s ecosystem advantages.

Where it works

Solid simple signing. Decent UX. Strong API legacy. If you signed up for HelloSign in 2018 and never left, you’re probably fine. If you’re evaluating in 2026, you have better options.

Where SignIQ pulls ahead.

Dropbox Sign StandardSignIQ Standard
Per-user/month (annual)$25$15
Annual cost (5 users) (Projected)$1,500/yr$900/yr
White-label brandingAPI tier onlyMulti-brand included
API accessSeparate API planStandard tier
Active developmentStalled since 2019Active V1 May 2026
Native lending integrationGeneric onlyOnyx IQ native
ESIGN Act / UETAYesYes

The bottom line.

Dropbox Sign delivers what HelloSign delivered six years ago. SignIQ delivers what teams are buying e-sign for in 2026: white-label by default, API at every paid tier, modern templates, and a price that doesn’t require an enterprise contract.

Modern e-sign. Not e-sign that stopped shipping in 2019.